aschae's Dogblog

Canine natural health, agility & training info

Oregon Confirms First Salmonella Case in Dog February 12, 2009

Source: PetProductNews.com, Feb 11, 2009

State public health officials say peanut butter biscuits contaminated.

Peanut butter dog biscuitsOregon Public Health officials confirmed that the national outbreak of Salmonella linked to tainted peanut butter products also affects pets. After laboratory testing, Salmonella was identified in a dog from a Douglas County household, according to the state’s department of human services.

Dog biscuits in the household were also found to be contaminated with the bacteria. They contain peanut butter that comes from the Peanut Corporation of America, the Blakely, Ga., plant linked to five human deaths and nearly 600 illnesses.

“The dog biscuits were on the list of products recalled several weeks ago,” Dr. Emilio DeBess, Oregon State Public Health veterinarian, said in a statement. The positive test results came from a package of Happy Tails Multi-Flavor Dog Biscuits sold at an Albertsons in Roseburg.

DeBess said this case should serve as a reminder that pet owners need to check not only their own food, but their pet food and treats as well. “If the products contain any peanut butter ingredients, you should check the FDA’s website or contact the manufacturer or the store where they were purchased to see if they are on the recall list,” he said.

 

PetSmart Voluntarily Recalls Grreat Choice(R) Dog Biscuits January 22, 2009

Source: CNNMoney.com, Jan 20, 2009

PetSmart (NASDAQ: PETM) is voluntarily recalling seven of its Grreat Choice® Dog Biscuit products that contain peanut paste made by Peanut Corporation of America (PCA). PCA is the focus of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigation into potential salmonella contamination of peanut butter and paste made at its Blakely, Georgia facility.

Although PetSmart is not aware of any reported cases of illness related to these products, it has removed these products from its store shelves and website and is conducting the recall as a precautionary measure.

The recalled products include only the following types of Grreat Choice Dog Biscuits sold between Aug. 21, 2008 and Jan. 19, 2009:

  • Small Assorted 32 oz., UPC 73725702900
  • Small/Medium Assorted 4 lb., UPC 73725700601
  • Small/Medium Assorted 8 lb., UPC 73725700605
  • Small/Medium Assorted 10 lb., UPC 73725702755
  • Large Assorted 8 lb., UPC 73725700638
  • Extra Large Assorted 8 lb., UPC 73725700779
  • Peanut Butter 4 lb., UPC 73725700766

Customers who purchased the recalled dog biscuit products should discontinue use immediately and can return the product to any PetSmart store for a complete refund or exchange. Customers can visit www.petsmartfacts.com for more information or contact PetSmart Customer Service at 1-888-839-9638.

No other products or flavors are included in this recall.

PetSmart, Inc. is the largest specialty pet retailer of services and solutions for the lifetime needs of pets. The company operates more than 1,107 pet stores in the United States and Canada, 132 in-store PetSmart PetsHotels® cat and dog boarding facilities, and is a leading online provider of pet supplies and pet care information (www.petsmart.com). PetSmart provides a broad range of competitively priced pet food and pet products; and offers complete pet training, pet grooming, pet boarding, doggie day camp and pet adoption services. Since 1994, PetSmart Charities®, Inc., an independent 501(c)(3) non-profit animal welfare organization, has funded more than $70 million in grants and programs benefiting animal welfare organizations and, through its in-store pet adoption programs, has helped save the lives of more than 3 million pets.

CUSTOMER INFORMATION AND CONTACTS:
www.petsmartfacts.com
customercare@petsmart.com
1-888-839-9638
NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
Jennifer Ericsson
PetSmart Media Line (623) 587-2177
mediarelations@ssg.petsmart.com
 

Appeals Could Stall Pet Food Recall Settlement January 9, 2009

Source: DogChannel.com

Two appeals filed in December 2008 will postpone payment of claims.

Posted: January 9, 2009, 5 a.m. EST

Compensation payments for pet owners affected by 2007’s pet food recall may be delayed due to appeals filed against a $24 million settlement agreed upon by companies that manufactured and dealt the contaminated food.

More than 23,000 pet owners in the United States have asked to receive compensation in the settlement, and those with approved claims were to start receiving checks in 2009. However, two appeals were filed in December 2008. According to the case’s claims administrator website, that means the payment of claims will be postponed.

“No payments may be made on eligible claims until all appeals are resolved,” the website states. “It is uncertain how long these appeals will take to resolve, and the timing of resolving the appeals is not within the control of the parties or their counsel. It is not uncommon for appeals to take several months or even years to resolve.”

The case began in March 2007 when Menu Foods, of Ontario, Canada, recalled more than 50 brands of dog food and more than 40 brands of cat food after a number of pets became sick. Several other companies soon followed suit. The recall eventually covered approximately 180 brands of pet food and treats produced by 12 different manufacturers and distributed, marketed, and sold to dozens of retailers.

Wheat gluten and rice-protein concentrate imported from China were found to have been contaminated with melamine, an industrial chemical used to make plastic, and cyanuric acid — the combination of which can lead to acute renal failure in small animals.

Menu Foods and other companies involved in the pet food recall agreed to pay up to $24 million in a settlement, which was approved by a federal judge in October 2008. Canadian courts approved the settlement in November.

The settlement agreement creates a settlement fund that will allow a potential recovery of up to 100 percent of economic damages incurred by pet owners. Pet owners can receive up to $900 for undocumented claims.

One of the appeals to the settlement concerns alleged mislabeling of pet food as “Made in the USA.” The other regards the fairness and adequacy of the settlement, among other arguments. Details were not immediately available.

 

MARS RECALL Wal-Mart SPECIAL KITTY(R) Gourmet Blend Cat Food October 27, 2008

Source: PR Newswire

Last update: 3:31 p.m. EDT Oct. 27, 2008
FRANKLIN, Tenn., Oct 27, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ — Even though there is no link between the SPECIAL KITTY(R) Gourmet Blend dry cat food manufactured at the Allentown, Pennsylvania factory and any human or pet illness, we are taking precautionary action to protect pets and their owners by announcing a voluntary recall of all sizes of SPECIAL KITTY(R) Gourmet Blend produced at the facility on August 11, 2008. This action is being taken as a result of potential Salmonella contamination.
This voluntary recall affects only a limited number of bags of SPECIAL KITTY(R) Gourmet Blend dry cat food sold at Wal-Mart locations in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, and West Virginia.
Mars Petcare has been working cooperatively with Wal-Mart to address this issue, and the affected product of this lot has already been removed from Wal-Mart’s shelves. As a result, consumers can be assured that all SPECIAL KITTY(R) Gourmet Blend products that remain on Wal-Mart’s shelves are safe and not subject to this recall.
Our top priority has always been and continues to be the health and welfare of pets and their owners, and we are working vigorously to identify the cause of the issue.
SOURCE Mars Petcare US
 

NJ company recalls dog food chips October 18, 2008

Filed under: Feeding,Pet Food Recalls,Recent News — aschae @ 10:32 am
Tags: , , ,

Source: Newsday.com, October 17, 2008

SECAUCUS, N.J. – The Hartz Mountain Corporation has voluntarily recalled a specific lot of its Hartz chicken-basted rawhide chips for dogs due to concerns that one or more bags within the lot are potentially contaminated with Salmonella.

The company announced the recall Friday, saying the two-pound plastic bags of chips with lot code JC23282, UPC number 3270096463 were distributed to a national retail customer it did not identify.

Hartz said the normal testing it conducts through an independent outside laboratory did not detect the presence of Salmonella in any of its rawhide products, but sample testing conducted by another laboratory did indicate the presence of the bacteria in a single bag of the chicken-basted rawhide chips.

Salmonella can cause serious infections in dogs and _ if there is cross-contamination caused by handling of the rawhide chips _ in people as well, especially children, the aged, and people with compromised immune systems.

Hartz is investigating the difference in test results and the potential source of the problem. It said there have been no reports of any animals or humans becoming ill.

 

Menu Foods Income Fund: Settlement Agreement in U.S. Pet Food Multidistrict Litigation Receives Final Approval October 16, 2008

Last update: 1:11 p.m. EDT Oct. 15, 2008
TORONTO, ONTARIO, Oct 15, 2008 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) — Menu Foods Income Fund (TSX: MEW.UN) announced that the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has certified the Settlement Class and given final approval of the comprehensive Settlement Agreement in the Pet Food Multi-District Litigation. The Settlement Agreement must also be approved by the Canadian courts. The motion for final approval in the Canadian courts is scheduled for November 3, 2008 and, if final Canadian court approval is obtained and no appeals are made, the settlement procedures would be implemented shortly thereafter. The Settlement Agreement would resolve more than 100 class action lawsuits filed in U.S. and Canadian courts relating to the recall of pet food and would be binding on all members of the Settlement Class, except for those individuals who have validly opted out of the settlement.
As previously disclosed, the Settlement Agreement creates a Settlement Fund of US$24 million that will allow a potential recovery of up to 100% of all economic damages incurred by pet owners, subject to certain limitations. The Settlement Fund, administered by a neutral claims administrator, will be available to persons in the United States and Canada who purchased or obtained, or whose pets used or consumed, recalled pet food.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Fund will be funded by the defendants, including Menu Foods and its product liability insurer. Menu Foods’ corporate contribution to the settlement is within Menu Foods’ previously published estimate for recall costs of C$55 million.
Paul Henderson, CEO of Menu Foods, commented: “The U.S. court approval is a significant milestone. If the Canadian courts approve the settlement, pet owners affected by the 2007 pet food recalls will receive compensation for their losses. Menu Foods looks forward to final resolution of this matter, which will enable us to focus on continuing the significant progress that has been made in rebuilding our business, namely delivering quality products to existing and new customers across North America.”
Persons with potential claims should not contact Menu Foods, but can contact the claims administrator at the following address:
In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation
Claims Administrator
c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP
P.O. Box 890
Philadelphia, PA 19105-0890
1-800-392-7785
 www.petfoodsettlement.com
Forward Looking Statements
This release includes certain forward-looking statements. Although Menu Foods believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Contacts:
Investor Inquiries:
Menu Foods GenPar Limited
Mark Wiens - Chief Financial Officer
(905) 826-3870 (ext. 420)

Media Inquiries:
Hill & Knowlton Canada
Robert Merrick
(416) 413-4602
SOURCE: Menu Foods Income Fund
 

Settlement To Be Argued In Pet Food Recall Case October 14, 2008

MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. (AP) Oct 13, 2008 ― What kind of monetary value can be placed on a pet?

That’s just one of the issues expected to be raised during oral arguments Tuesday before a Camden federal judge over a $32 million settlement for contaminated pet food lawsuits.

Menu Foods Income Fund recalled millions of containers of pet food last year. The products were sold under some 90 different brand names.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration found the food contained melamine, a chemical used to make plastics. The chemical was traced to contaminated wheat gluten imported from China.

More than 9,500 people in the United States and Canada have made claims. Some 28 have filed objections to the settlement.

Some of those objections question how they can determine the monetary value of a pet considered a close companion.

 

Pet food plant in Everson closing October 2, 2008

Filed under: Pet Food Recalls,Recent News — aschae @ 6:48 am
Tags: , ,

Wednesday, October 01, 2008
By Teresa F. Lindeman, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A Fayette County pet food plant involved in two salmonella scares will be permanently closed, according to a notice sent to state officials.

Representatives for Mars Petcare U.S. Inc. notified the state Department of Labor and Industry in a Sept. 18 letter that 53 associates would be unemployed by year-end because of the decision to close the plant in Everson.

The notice came days after Mars announced a voluntary recall of cat and dog food made at the plant because of potential contamination with a strain of salmonella. Officials said they had stopped production in July and would not resume manufacturing until the source of the salmonella had been determined.

The same plant had been closed for a cleaning in 2007 after salmonella had been found in bags of dog food produced there.

Salmonella can cause diarrhea, fever and vomiting in pets. People handling contaminated pet foods can potentially be infected, too.

In materials announcing the most recent recall, the company said no direct link between product made this year at the Everson plant and human or pet illness had been seen.

Pet food brands affected included Ol’ Roy, Pedigree, Retriever, Wegman’s and Red Flannel, according to a Mars news release. Officials said many of those are national brands produced at multiple facilities. For example, just 2.7 percent of the company’s Pedigree products came out of Everson.

The closure notice sent to state officials, as part of Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification requirements, said workers were told about the closure on Sept. 12. Layoffs could start in mid-November and continue into December.

 

Pet-food recall leads to 6,000 claims and counting September 22, 2008

Filed under: Pet Food Recalls — aschae @ 9:48 am
Tags: , ,

Pet-food recall leads to 6,000 claims and counting

Updated 8/27/2008 10:06 AM |

Almost 6,000 claims have been filed in a class-action settlement stemming from last year’s massive pet-food recall.

Menu Foods, other pet-food makers and retailers in May agreed to set up a $24 million cash fund to compensate pet owners whose cats and dogs became sick or died after eating food that had a contaminated ingredient from China.

The filing period for claims began May 30 and will run until Nov. 24.

“I expect that number (of claims) will go up a lot. There’s quite a bit of time to go,” says attorney Sherrie Savett of plaintiffs’ law firm Berger & Montague.

The Food and Drug Administration never identified how many pets were affected, but it received more than 17,000 complaints.

Once a claim is filed, it will be reviewed by an independent claims administrator. Claimants may receive a 100% cash payment for all documented expenses deemed reasonable, including veterinary bills and burial costs. They may receive up to $900 for undocumented expenses. Under the terms of the settlement, most claims are likely to be paid next year.

To be eligible, claimants must have bought or fed their pets one of the recalled pet foods.

A federal judge in New Jersey gave the settlement preliminary approval in May. A hearing for final approval is scheduled for October.

If the court approves the settlement as expected, it would resolve more than 100 lawsuits brought in the U.S. and a dozen in Canada. The $24 million is in addition to $8 million that pet-food makers have already paid to pet owners.

Legal fees and attorneys’ expenses, which haven’t been determined, will come out of the fund. Attorneys’ fees cannot exceed 31% of the fund for the U.S. and Canadian attorneys combined, according to the settlement’s terms.

The vast majority of the fund will go to pet owners whose pets were injured or died as a result of kidney failure, which was linked to the contaminant.

The FDA determined that the pet-food ingredients, sold to pet-food makers as wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate, were adulterated in China with the industrial chemical melamine to make them appear richer in protein than they actually were.

The recall was the largest ever for the pet-food industry.

It began March 16, 2007, by Menu Foods, a large maker of wet pet food for many pet-food brands.

The recall grew to involve 12 pet-food makers and 180 brands of pet food and treats. Along with Menu, other defendants include Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Iams and retailers such as Wal-Mart.

Menu Foods, which supplied most of the recalled foods, has pegged its recall costs at $55 million, some of which went to the settlement fund.

If there is money remaining after claims have been processed, it will go to charities that promote the well-being of pets, the settlement says.

A website has been set up at www.petfoodsettlement.com. The claims administrator can be reached at 800-392-7785.

 

FDA Pet Food Safety Policies Comprised of Twisted Logic September 13, 2008

Filed under: Pet Food Recalls — aschae @ 10:25 am
Tags: , ,

(NaturalNews) The FDA is supposed to protect our pet’s food. Congress took note of the deadly pet food recall last year and mandated the FDA to clean up its act. Human food and pet food regulations are supposed to be updated and in working order by September 2009 according to the Amendments Act. I have my doubts. The list below does not come directly from the FDA in exact words, yet it is a fair interpretation of how the FDA acts in caring for the safety of our pet’s food and treats….(more)

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.