aschae's Dogblog

Canine natural health, agility & training info

Manteca ordinance could force all dogs to be altered, CA March 18, 2009

Filed under: Health,Legal,Recent News — aschae @ 3:31 pm
Tags: , , ,

Source:  , March 16, 2009 6:00 AM

MANTECA – An ordinance requiring all dogs be spayed or neutered by the time they are 6 months old will come before the City Council at its meeting Tuesday night.

It is an expansion of a similar ordinance that pertains only to pit bull breed dogs that was passed by the council in September.

At that time, Mayor Willie Weatherford directed the city staff to develop a mandatory spay and neuter ordinance for all dogs.

Police Chief Dave Bricker, in his report to the council, says the goal of the expanded program is to reduce the number of animals that end up in the city’s animal shelter and the resulting euthanasia rate for those animals.

The proposed ordinance provides exceptions for police, livestock, and health service working dogs, as well as licensed show dogs and dogs in whom the procedure could be life threatening because of their age or medical condition, according to Bricker.

Cost for spaying or neutering will be borne by the dog owner. Currently costs range from $60 to $130, depending on the size of the dog, according to his report.

The report notes that other communities that have passed similar ordinances have found the number of dogs being licensed dropped because some owners could not afford the additional cost.

Manteca currently licenses about 3,000 dogs each year.

Bricker said the city will continue to use its police volunteers to contact dog owners who do not renew their licenses, which he feels will minimize any drop locally.

Sacramento and Los Angeles counties have adopted similar ordinances, according to the report.

The council meets at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the council chambers at City Hall, 1001 W. Center St.

 

New dog law: Legislation targets poor treatment at ‘mills’, PA November 16, 2008

Source: The Tribune-Democrat, By PATRICK BUCHNOWSKI, Nov 15, 2008

The showdown between dog lovers and dog breeders ended when Gov. Ed Rendell signed into law a bill cracking down on ill treatment of dogs at large breeding kennels.

More than a month after HB 2525 was signed, those on both sides are digesting its impact.

Some are not happy, and say the animal-rights supporters went too far. Supporters of the bill say it protects the animals from neglect and abuse.

“Some provisions of the dog law are for all owners, but mostly it’s for larger kennels,” said D Black, executive director of the Cambria County Humane Society in Richland Township.

Animal shelters, mainly those in the state’s eastern region, end up taking in sick puppies and female dogs that are over-bred and no longer useful to kennels.

The law seeks to curb puppy mills that produce large numbers of purebreds, often under miserable conditions that can lead to birth defects and disease.

The new law made it illegal for dog breeders to:

n Use wire flooring in cages;

n Stack cages;

nSqueeze animals into cages that are too small.

The law requires exercise and twice yearly veterinary exams for dogs, and the new standards apply to anyone selling more than 60 dogs in a year or anyone selling a dog to a pet shop or wholesaler.

Officials say the changes affect roughly 650 of the 2,750 licensed kennels in the state.

Out of business?

Some say animal-rights supporters have an agenda.

“A lot of people are going to be put out of business because of this bill,” said state Rep. Bob Bastian, R-Somerset. “That’s definitely their agenda.”

Bastian, a retired veterinarian, said caring for the dogs should be left to the attending vet and depends largely on the breed and size of dogs.

“A one-size-fits-all bill is not going to work,” he said.

The bill’s signing comes in the wake of some high-profile raids of illegal puppy mills.

The shooting of 80 dogs at a Berks County kennel in August by a breeder who was ordered to provide vet care for flea bites is widely believed to be the impetus for the bill’s quick passage, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

In May, a state dog warden and a Somerset County humane society officer seized 17 dogs from an illegal Amish puppy mill near Meyersdale. The dogs were kept in wire cages in a dark barn, where the breeding females received little exercise.

The breeder, Bennie Hostetler, 41, told authorities said he sold the puppies for $150 each to a man who takes them to a pet store in eastern Pennsylvania, where they often sell for $500 or more.

“Those are the worst of the commercial breeding kennels,” said Chris Ryder, press secretary for the state Department of Agriculture.

“This will go a long way to shutting down puppy mill operations,” he said.

‘Breed for quality’

Dale and Lorri Barron breed Siberian huskies at Lauradale Kennel in Jefferson Township. Two of their dogs appeared a few years ago in the Disney movie “Eight Below.”

Lorri Barron called HB 2525 a good law but one that needs some changes.

The law, she said, requires animals be kept in 50-85 degree temperatures.

“Sporting dogs, sled dogs, Siberian huskies like the cold weather,” she said. “My point for commercial kennels is the temperatures should be regulated according to the breed of dogs.”

Barron said the law does not impact her business because they don’t breed 60 or more dogs a year and do not sell to pet stores.

“We try to breed for quality, not quantity,” she said.

But Ryder said the bill was amended before passage after sportsman’s groups and small breeder raised concerns.

The few new requirements to those breeders is limited to having fire extinguishers available and a vet approved exercise plan, he said.

“There is very little in this bill that will effect them,” Ryder said.

 

PA’s New Dog Law Provides Better Protections for ‘Man’s Best Friend,’ says Gov. Rendell During Ceremonial Bill Signing October 27, 2008

Last update: 12:45 p.m. EDT Oct. 27, 2008
LANGHORNE, Pa., Oct 27, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ — Hundreds of thousands of dogs in the state’s commercial kennels will lead better and healthier lives now that Governor Edward G. Rendell has signed a bill that will bring sweeping reforms to Pennsylvania’s dog law.
During a visit to the Center for Animal Referral and Emergency Services today, Governor Rendell ceremonially signed House Bill 2525, which eliminates deplorable conditions in puppy breeding operations and provides for better health among dogs in kennels.
The Governor signed the bill into law on Oct. 9 to protect dogs in kennels by ensuring that the ban on owners who euthanize dogs would take effect immediately.
Governor Rendell said the new law, Act 119 of 2008, will help to improve Pennsylvania’s tarnished reputation when it comes to the treatment of dogs in commercial kennels.
“Thanks to the hard work of many dog lovers and the leadership of members of the General Assembly, there is a bright future for dogs in Pennsylvania,” said Governor Rendell. “Pennsylvania has long-suffered the label ‘Puppy Mill Capital of the East,’ primarily because of the horrific, but sadly legal, conditions in some of our state’s worst dog breeding kennels. We are changing that with this new law.
“Within one year, Pennsylvania will be a leader in the treatment of dogs in commercial breeding kennels, shedding our shameful reputation. We want to provide a measure of reassurance that when a family welcomes these lovable pets into their home, the dogs are healthy and happy.”
Act 119 addresses the health and welfare needs of the dogs housed in large commercial breeding kennels by requiring these operations to meet the new physical standards for cage size and flooring within one year, unless granted a temporary waiver by the Department of Agriculture.
Among other protections for dogs, the new law doubles the minimum floor space for dogs, eliminates wire flooring, and requires exercise that is at least as good as unfettered access to an exercise area twice the size of the primary enclosure. The previous law did not require that dogs ever be taken out of cages, much less be provided access to exercise areas. The wire flooring allowed under the previous law breaks down easily and destroys dogs’ feet over time.
The bill also requires veterinary examinations for each dog twice per year.
The requirements for other types of kennels, like sporting and hobby dog kennels, are virtually unchanged. These entities do not operate with the purpose of breeding large quantities of dogs to sell for profit.
For more information on the new act, visit www.DogLawAction.com.
The Rendell administration is committed to creating a first-rate public education system, protecting our most vulnerable citizens and continuing economic investment to support our communities and businesses.
To find out more about Governor Rendell’s initiatives and to sign up for his weekly newsletter, visit www.governor.state.pa.us.
CONTACT:
Chuck Ardo
717-783-1116
SOURCE Pennsylvania Office of the Governor
 http://www.DogLawAction.com
 

Court upholds ban on pit bulls, Ontario October 26, 2008

Appeal court judges overturn lower court ruling, saying Ontario law is justified and not ‘arbitrary’
Source: TheStar, Oct 25, 2008 04:30 AM, by Tanya Talaga

Any dog that looks, wags and woofs like a pit bull is not welcome in Ontario, the province’s highest court has ruled.

The Ontario Court of Appeal yesterday upheld the province’s controversial 2005 ban on pit bulls, saying the dogs have a tendency to be unpredictable and even apparently docile pit bulls may attack without warning.

Yesterday’s decision overturns a 2007 lower court ruling that said Ontario’s definition of pit bulls was too vague because it did not refer to a specific type or breed of dog.

But the appeal court disagreed, restoring the law to the form in which it was enacted.

The three-judge panel said the province’s total ban on pit bulls is not “arbitrary” or “grossly disproportionate” and does not violate any constitutional rights.

“… Evidence of unpredictability provided the Legislature with a sufficient basis to conclude that the protection of public safety required no less drastic measures than a total ban on pit bulls,” they wrote.

Ontario Attorney-General Chris Bentley said he was pleased with the ruling and called on all those affected to be respectful of the law.

“We all love our pets,” Bentley said in an interview. “As a government we are bringing in legislation, in other circumstances, to ensure their safety. In this case we brought in legislation to protect the people of Ontario. We did it because the public demanded it.”

After a series of vicious pit bull attacks, the Ontario government amended the Dog Owners’ Liability Act to ban the breeding, sale and ownership of pit bulls. Dogs born before Nov. 26, 2005, are allowed to live, but they must be sterilized, and muzzled and leashed when in public places. Dogs born after that date must be destroyed.

The court says the ban applies to pit bull terriers, Staffordshire bull terriers, American Staffordshire terriers, American pit bull terriers and any dog with a similar appearance or characteristics.

But that blanket definition means hundreds of dogs could now be at risk, said Jean-anne Moors, a dog owner who is part of the grassroots group that challenged the law.

“Who is to decide who is a pit bull? A pit bull is a mongrel and doesn’t exist as a breed,” she said. “It is a mixed breed dog with certain characteristics which people say are pit bull types.”

She said she has three Staffordshire bull terriers and all are “wonderful pets.” They are older and not under threat of destruction.

Moors said her group has spent nearly $500,000 in private donations from dog owner groups across Canada and the U.S. to challenge the ban. She fears many dogs will be killed because the definition of a pit bull appears open to interpretation. Technically, animal control officers who seize a dog they believe to be a pit bull can have it destroyed if the owner doesn’t try to stop it through a court action, she said.

Breed-specific legislation is discriminatory, believes the Toronto Humane Society. “We are disappointed in the court ruling,” said Ian McConachie, senior communicator with the society.

“A golden retriever could look like a pit bull. The legislation doesn’t define it clearly enough.”

 

Mount Vernon considering ‘dangerous dog’ law, WA October 9, 2008

Filed under: Legal,Recent News — aschae @ 6:43 am
Tags: , , ,

By ROB PIERCY / KING 5 News

06:00 PM PDT on Wednesday, October 8, 200

MOUNT VERNON, Wash. – A few times a week you can find Bill Sauneuf at a Mount Vernon park, playing catch with his German Shepherd “Jester.”

Though Jester is well behaved, Sauneuf worries that changes in the city dog ordinance could force him to buy liability insurance.

“If the law required me to have one, I’d get one, but wouldn’t like it,” he said.

The city is looking at whether to require owners of “dangerous dogs,” dogs that have viciously attacked in the past, to carry $500,000 insurance policies. Owners of so-called “potentially dangerous dogs” would have to carry $250,000 policies.

“Any dog that would be menacing, threatening, chasing other people or other domestic animals, would be an example of behavior of a potentially dangerous dog,” said Jill Boudreau of the Mount Vernon Police Dept.

The city animal control officer is the one who makes the decision and often bases that decision on what witnesses say.

Sauneuf says that’s troublesome for people who own dogs like jester.

“He’s a big dog and somebody could easily be scared by him,” he said.

But Chuck Starkey, whose dog Teddy was nearly another dog’s lunch, thinks some owners should have large insurance policies.

“Just to protect the people who get attacked, because you know they’re going to need some help,” he said.

Saunuef says instead of insurance, a better requirement for dog owners would be education.

“Make them train their dogs, put them through classes and education, treat the problem, educate the dogs, educate the people about their dogs,” he said.

Insurance policies aren’t cheap. One of the best deals we could find online cost $900 a year for $250,000 worth of coverage.

The Mount Vernon City Council is holding a public hearing at 7 tonight on changes to the dog ordinance.

 

Ordinance Questions Baffle Omaha Dog Owners October 9, 2008

Filed under: Legal,Recent News — aschae @ 6:41 am
Tags: , , , ,

Source: WOWT.comLast Updated: 7:53 PM Oct 8, 2008 Reporter: John Chapman

Omaha’s dangerous dog ordinance takes effect next week and a lot of pet owners are still unsure what it means for them and how it will be enforced.

Lucky is one of many dogs that run and play at Omaha’s dog park at 108th and Maple. But Lucky’s owners and many other dog owners are not really sure how things will change once the recently passed Omaha dog ordinance goes into effect October 16th.

“One of the things I wonder about, how enforceable some of it is,” says Kent Pavelka. Who’s gonna enforce the part about a dog only being out for so many minutes?”

Pavelka is talking about a part of the ordinance that makes it against the law to tether an animal outdoors in excess of 15 minutes at any one time, unless an adult is there to watch it.

Channel 6 News found many dogs in violation on Wednesday if the ordinance was currently in effect. Many of the dogs found tethered outside were watching the house of their owners while they were at work.

“The Humane Society says it’s inhuman,” says Omaha City Councilman Frank Brown. “They’re doing it for a purpose, the dog is watching their house. This is going to be a hardship on those people who use their dogs for watchdogs and they’re taking great care of the dog.”

Steven Davis takes great care of his dog Bango, a 4-month-old pit bull, and is spending a lot of money getting his companion ready for when the ordinance does takes effect.

“I paid $30 to get him microchipped, $40 for his shots. He had to get a parvo shot, rabies shot, distemper.” Davis is working hard to follow the new ordinance, but things will get tougher on Bango when it goes into effect.

Pit bulls won’t be required to be muzzled while outside a fenced yard until January 1st.

 

Pa. governor to sign dog-law overhaul October 9, 2008

Filed under: Puppy Mills — aschae @ 6:27 am
Tags: , , , , , ,

var requestedWidth = 0;

if(requestedWidth > 0){
document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.width = requestedWidth + “px”;
document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.margin = “0px 0px 10px 10px”;
}HARRISBURG, Pa.—Gov. Ed Rendell said Wednesday he will sign a bill intended to dramatically improve the care and treatment of dogs kept in Pennsylvania’s larger commercial kennels.

The measure would impose new regulations to increase the size of cages, require annual veterinary checkups and crack down on what critics describe as inhumane puppy mills. It was passed earlier Wednesday by the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Rendell, who owns two rescued golden retrievers, has spent more than two years pushing for tougher enforcement of Pennsylvania’s dog law.

“Within one year, Pennsylvania will be a leader in the treatment of dogs in commercial breeding kennels, shedding our reputation as the puppy-mill capital of the country,” Rendell said during a news conference after the Legislature adjourned.

The dog law revisions took on new momentum in August, when operators of two Berks County kennels shot 80 dogs after being ordered to let veterinarians examine some of them.

The rules would pertain mostly to commercial kennels that provide dogs to dealers or pet shops, or that traffic in at least 60 dogs per year. Backers say it would have virtually no effect on boarding kennels, pet stores or rescue shelters.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.